Mosaik-RASopathies

Last updated on: 07.05.2024

Dieser Artikel auf Deutsch

Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please login to access all articles, images, and functions.

Our content is available exclusively to medical professionals. If you have already registered, please login. If you haven't, you can register for free (medical professionals only).


Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please complete your registration to access all articles and images.

To gain access, you must complete your registration. You either haven't confirmed your e-mail address or we still need proof that you are a member of the medical profession.

Finish your registration now

DefinitionThis section has been translated automatically.

"RASopathies" refers to a group of diseases surrounding Noonan syndrome that are due to dysregulation of the RAS/RAF pathway by mostly activating constitutional mutations of involved genes.

Common clinical features include:

  • cardiovascular abnormalities
  • reduced growth
  • dysmorphia
  • abnormalities of the skin
  • developmental disorders of variable severity

In some cases, there is also a tumor disposition. Like the PI3K/AKT pathway, with which it is interconnected, the RAS/RAF pathway stimulates cell growth and is mediated by RAS proteins after binding of growth factors to receptors on the cell surface. The classical RAS proteins are encoded by the HRAS, KRAS, and NRAS genes. Somatic mutations in these genes, which occur spontaneously in single cells and lead to clonal expansion due to a growth advantage, play a widespread role in oncogenesis (Li S et al. (2018)).

Mosaic RASopathies have a different phenotype than constitutional RASopathies, which are due to postzygotic gain-of-function mutations in RAS/RAF genes that would likely be lethal if they were constitutional (Hafner C et al. 2013). HRAS mutations are an exception. Mutation detection is usually only successful in affected tissue.

Neurocutaneous melanosis affects a small proportion of patients with the common congenital melanocytic nevi (CMN) and is characterized by large (giant) CMN combined with often symptomatic leptomeningeal melanocytosis (Alikhan A et al 2012). It is caused by an early embryonic NRAS mutation in the neuroectoderm. The risk of melanoma depends on the extent of CMN and is circa 1% in CMN in general versus 12% in giant CMN. Neurocutaneous melanosis is also associated with an increased risk of CNS melanoma.

Localized postzygotic mutations in different genes lead to further nevi, for example a keratinocytic epidermal nevus or a nevus sebaceus.

Clinical pictureThis section has been translated automatically.

If the mutations occur earlier in development and affect several tissues, syndromic clinical pictures with the main symptom of a specific nevus occur (Lim YH et al. (2017).

These include Schimmelpenning-Feuerstein-Mims syndrome (SFMS), in which the CNS, eyes and skeleton (osteomalacia, hypophosphatemic rickets) can be particularly affected, with evidence of mosaic mutations in HRAS, KRAS and NRAS (Groesser L et al. (2012).

The considerable variability of the clinical symptoms could be explained by the identification as a mosaic disease. Syndromes with congenital abnormalities of the eye and skin have also been identified as mosaic RASopathy:

  • oculo-ectodermal syndrome (OES, mutations in KRAS), whose main features are epibulbar dermoids and congenital scalp defects, and
  • encephalo-cranio-cutaneous lipomatosis (ECCL, mutations in FGFR1 and KRAS), in which the eponymous lipomas are also present in the CNS (Moog U et al. 2020).

Both syndromes can have other abnormalities of the skin, including a nevus sebaceus. They also include a predisposition to jaw tumors, non-ossifying fibromas and, in the case of ECCL, low-grade gliomas. As it is not always possible to clearly assign previously used clinical diagnoses, the term (KRAS-associated) mosaic RASopathy is often more appropriate.

Vascular malformations: The diagnostic differentiation of the isolated port wine stain (symmetrical nevus flammeus) from the sporadically occurring Sturge-Weber-Krabbe syndrome (SWS) with facial nevus flammeus, intracranial and intraocular vascular malformations is prognostically significant. In Sturge-Weber-Krabbe syndrome, leptomeningeal angiomatosis can lead to epileptic crises as early as the first year of life, affecting psychomotor and mental development. Stroke-like episodes and glaucoma are also among the serious manifestations.

Etiologically, the common port wine stain and the rare Sturge-Weber-Krabbe syndrome are two extreme clinical manifestations of the same molecular mechanism. In malformed capillaries, a specific postzygotic point mutation in the GNAQ gene that activates the RAS/RAF signaling pathway is identified in the majority of cases in both syndromes (Shirley MD et al. 2013). It is likely that non-syndromic port wine stains are caused by a late postzygotic mutation and Sturge-Weber syndrome by an early postzygotic mutation. Mutations in RAS and other genes of the RAS/RAF signaling pathway have also been identified in sporadic vascular malformations (Al-Olabi L et al. 2018).

Pink capillary malformations of the skin in combination with arteriovenous malformations in at least one other family member and occasionally associated hemihyperplasia form a clinically variable clinical picture (CM-AVM), which was only described after the identification of LOF variants in the RASA1 gene (Eerola I et al. 2003). RASA1 is a negative regulator of RAS. Consequently, loss of function also activates the RAS/RAF signaling pathway.

While Sturge-Weber syndrome, which is based on an activating point mutation in the GNAQ gene, is only observed in mosaic form, RASA1-associated phenotypes can follow an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance. In addition to the dominantly inherited mutation in one gene copy, a second newly occurring mutation in the second gene copy leads to loss of function of the RASA1 gene.

LiteratureThis section has been translated automatically.

  1. Alikhan A et al. (2012) Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now? Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 67: 495. e1-17; quiz 512-514.
  2. Al-Olabi L et al (2018) Mosaic RAS/MAPK variants cause sporadic vascular malformations which respond to targeted therapy. J Clin Invest 128: 1496-1508
  3. Bae T et al (2018) Different mutational rates and mechanisms in human cells at pregastrulation and neurogenesis. Science 359: 550-555
  4. Baldassari S et al. (2019) Dissecting the genetic basis of focal cortical dysplasia: a large cohort study. Acta Neuropathol 138: 885-900
  5. Eerola I et al (2003) Capillary malformation-arteriovenous malformation, a new clinical and genetic disorder caused by RASA1 mutations. Am J Hum Genet 73: 1240-1249
  6. Groesser L et al (2012) Postzygotic HRAS and KRAS mutations cause nevus sebaceous and Schimmelpenning syndrome. Nat Genet 44: 783-787
  7. Hafner C et al (2013) Mosaic RASopathies. Cell Cycle 12: 43-50
  8. Happle R (2014) How common are genetic mosaics in the skin? Dermatologist 65: 536-541
  9. Has C et al (2018) Rudolf Happle on his 80th birthday. Dermatologist 69: 343-346
  10. Keppler-Noreuil KM et al (2015) PIK3CA-related overgrowth spectrum (PROS): diagnostic and testing eligibility criteria, differential diagnosis, and evaluation. Am J Med Genet A 167A: 287-295
  11. Li S et al (2018) A model for RAS mutation patterns in cancers: finding the sweet spot. Nat Rev Cancer 18: 767-777
  12. Lim YH et al (2017) Mosaicism in cutaneous disorders. Annu Rev Genet 51: 123-141
  13. Lindhurst MJ et al (2011) A mosaic activating mutation in AKT1 associated with the Proteus syndrome. N Engl J Med 365: 611-619
  14. Mirzaa G et al (2016) PIK3CA-associated developmental disorders exhibit distinct classes of mutations with variable expression and tissue distribution. JCI Insight 1: pii: 87623
  15. Moog U et al (2020) Diseases caused by genetic mosaics. Dtsch Ärztebl Int 117: 119-125
  16. Happle R (2016) The categories of cutaneous mosaicism: a proposed classification. Am J Med Genet A 170A: 452-459.
  17. Peron A et al (2018) Genetics, genomics, and genotype-phenotype correlations of TSC: insights for clinical practice. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 178: 281-290.
  18. Rohlin A et al. (2009) Parallel sequencing used in detection of mosaic mutations: comparison with four diagnostic DNA screening techniques. Hum Mutat 30: 1012-1020
  19. Shirley MD et al (2013) Sturge-Weber syndrome and port-wine stains caused by somatic mutation in GNAQ. N Engl J Med 368: 1971-1979

Last updated on: 07.05.2024