Amalgam allergyT78.4

Author:Prof. Dr. med. Peter Altmeyer

All authors of this article

Last updated on: 29.10.2020

Dieser Artikel auf Deutsch

Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please login to access all articles, images, and functions.

Our content is available exclusively to medical professionals. If you have already registered, please login. If you haven't, you can register for free (medical professionals only).


Requires free registration (medical professionals only)

Please complete your registration to access all articles and images.

To gain access, you must complete your registration. You either haven't confirmed your e-mail address or we still need proof that you are a member of the medical profession.

Finish your registration now

DefinitionThis section has been translated automatically.

Rare type IV allergy(see below) to the mercury contained in amalgam.

Clinical featuresThis section has been translated automatically.

Stomatitis, erosions, lichen planus mucosae, recurrent aphthous changes, urticarial exanthema (very rare). Not infrequently, an "amalgam allergy" is a sign of a somatoform disorder and thus requires a very differentiated approach.

DiagnosisThis section has been translated automatically.

Medical history, epicutaneous test for mercury derivatives.

Epicutaneous tests with the various mercury compounds for the detection of a type IV allergy show variable, not always reproducible results. The epicutaneous test should be performed with standardized 1% mercury(II) amine chloride in petroleum jelly and 5% amalgam in petroleum jelly. Exposure for 24 or 48 hours and late readings (at least 72 hours) are required. Due to the wide range of morphological reaction possibilities, the test should only be carried out by experienced, dermatologically versed allergologists.

Allergic reactions to phenyl mercury borate or acetate or to other mercury compounds (e.g. thiomersal) are at best vague indications of the presence of an allergy to inorganic mercury.

TherapyThis section has been translated automatically.

A positive epicutaneous test results in 3 requirements:
  • If there are no clinical symptoms, amalgam fillings can be left in place.
  • In case of clinical symptoms as well as temporal and topographical connection with an amalgam filling, fillings should be replaced, e.g. with ceramic or biogold fillings. Any further contact with mercury should be avoided.
  • As a precaution, amalgam should be avoided in any future cavity restoration.
"Amalgam drainage" (methods are controversial!) with selenium (e.g. selenase 1 tbl/day for at least 4 weeks), if necessary additional zinc and vitamin E preparations .

Note(s)This section has been translated automatically.

Doctors are often confronted with the question of an allergy to amalgam in dental fillings. Mostly complex, elusive symptoms are expressed. They are often also made aware by a dentist or a "holistic" arguing dental technician of the possibility of material replacement as a solution to their health problems.

LiteratureThis section has been translated automatically.

  1. Bailer J et al (2003) Ill due to amalgam? 10 rules for managing the symptomatic patient. MMW progression Med 145: 34-38
  2. Dunsche A et al (2003) Lichenoid reactions of murine mucosa associated with amalgam. Br J Dermatol 148: 741-748
  3. Fuchs Th (1994) Statement of the DKG of DDG on amalgam allergy. dermatologist 45: 415
  4. Koch W (1995) Health risks of amalgam fillings from a dermatological and dental perspective. Z Dermatol 181: 6-15
  5. Lazarov A et al (2003) Contact orofacial granulomatosis caused by delayed hypersensitivity to gold and mercury. J Am Acad Dermatol 49: 1117-1120

Authors

Last updated on: 29.10.2020

Author: Prof. Dr. med. Peter Altmeyer